Titanium to Trash? Duplex Steel Saves $14/kg in Desalination Plants (Saltwater Test Data)

The desalination industry faces a brutal reckoning: $1.2M titanium heat exchangers are failing in 3-5 years – not decades. 2024 field data from Saudi Arabia’s Ras Al-Khair plant reveals chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking (CISCC) propagating through Grade 5 titanium at 80°C brine temperatures. This isn’t an anomaly. Accelerated corrosion fatigue is demolishing ROI projections globally.

But here’s the pivot: Super duplex UNS S32750 (2507) and lean duplex UNS S32101 (2101) aren’t just surviving – they’re slashing $14/kg in direct costs while doubling service life. Below, we dissect third-party test data, real-world failure analytics, and operational protocols proving titanium’s reign is over.


1. Titanium’s Hidden Cost Cascade: Beyond Material Prices

Titanium (Gr. 2/5) dominates spec sheets for its “immune-to-corrosion” mythos. But 2024 plant autopsies expose systemic vulnerabilities:

Failure Mode Frequency Cost Impact Root Cause
Chloride-induced SCC 87% of units $380k/repair Cyclic stress + [Cl⁻] >32,000 ppm
Biofilm crevice corrosion 68% 12% efficiency loss/year Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization
Hydrogen embrittlement 41% Catastrophic shaft failure Cathodic overprotection in RO stages

The math hurts:

  • Material Premium: Titanium @ $42/kg vs. duplex 2205 @ $14/kg

  • Fabrication Penalty: Argon purging + orbital welding = $120/hr labor (2.5× duplex TIG costs)

  • Replacement Domino Effect: Failed titanium pump shafts shutdown entire evaporation trains – $28k/hour in lost production


2. Saltwater Test Data: Duplex Steel vs. Titanium (2024 Benchmarks)

Third-party testing across 12 plants (UAE, Saudi, Israel) subjected materials to 55°C seawater with 45,000 ppm chlorides:

Parameter Titanium Gr.5 Duplex 2205 Super Duplex 2507 Lean Duplex 2101
Corrosion rate (mpy) 0.0015 0.0009 0.0003 0.0011
CPT (°C) 95 >110 >130 >85
CCT (°C) 65 >95 >110 >70
Fatigue strength @ 10⁷ cycles (MPa) 290 395 430 350
Max service temp (°C) 120 150 160 130

*(CPT=Critical Pitting Temp, CCT=Critical Crevice Temp | Source: ASTM G48/G150, ISO 15156)*

Shock findings:

  • Titanium suffered pitting at weld HAZs after 6 months

  • Super duplex 2507 showed ZERO weight loss after 24 months

  • Lean duplex 2101 outperformed 316L stainless at 1/3 the cost


3. The $14/kg Savings Breakdown: Where Every Dollar Comes From

a) Material & Fabrication Savings

Component Titanium Cost Duplex 2205 Cost Savings
Condenser tubes (per meter) $1,480 $410 72%
RO membrane housings $28,000 $9,200 67%
Brine pump impellers $16,500 $5,300 68%

Fabrication efficiency:

  • Titanium: Requires orbital TIG + trailing shields ($145/meter weld)

  • Duplex: Standard TIG with 2.5% nitrogen purge ($38/meter) → 74% cost reduction

b) Operational Economics: Lifetime Cost Analysis

*(50,000 m³/day plant, 24/7 operation)*

Component Titanium Lifetime Duplex Lifetime Cost Difference (10 yrs)
Heat exchanger tubes 5–7 years 20+ years -$2.1M
High-pressure piping 8 years 25+ years -$860k
Pump shafts 3–4 years 12+ years -$420k

Total plant savings$540k–$780k/year after duplex retrofit


4. Implementing Duplex: Critical Technical Protocols

Switching materials requires precision engineering:

a) Grade Selection Guide

Environment Recommended Grade PREN Max Temp
RO membranes (<40°C) S32101 (2101) 26 50°C
Brine heaters (60–90°C) S32205 (2205) 35 120°C
High-pressure discharge lines S32750 (2507) 43 150°C

*(PREN = %Cr + 3.3x%Mo + 16x%N)*

b) Welding & Fabrication Specs

  • Heat input control: 0.5–1.5 kJ/mm (prevents sigma phase)

  • Interpass temp: <100°C for 2205, <90°C for 2507

  • Shielding gas: 98% Ar / 2% N₂ backing gas for root passes

c) Quality Validation

  1. Ferrite testing: FN 35–55 via Feritscope® (per ASTM A923)

  2. PREN verification: PMI testing for Cr/Mo/N content

  3. Corrosion auditing: ASTM G48 Method A testing at 25°C

“After switching to 2507 super duplex, our maintenance costs dropped 68%. The ROI paid for the retrofit in 14 months.”
– Karim Fawzi, Lead Engineer, Shuqaiq 3 Plant


5. Real-World Case: Ras Al-Khair Titanium-to-Duplex Retrofit

Problem: Grade 5 titanium evaporator tubes failing every 4 years due to CISCC
Solution:

  • Replaced with seamless super duplex S32750 tubes

  • Automated orbital welding with nitrogen purge

  • Installed IoT corrosion monitors (Anode Technology® sensors)

Results:

  • Material savings: $1.2M (42% reduction)

  • Extended lifespan: Projected 25+ years (vs. original 4-year titanium cycle)

  • Efficiency gain: 11% higher thermal conductivity reduced energy consumption


The Bottom Line: Data Doesn’t Lie

  1. Titanium’s Achilles’ heel: Vulnerable to chloride SCC above 30,000 ppm and 60°C – precisely the conditions in modern high-efficiency desalination plants.

  2. Duplex advantage: Combines austenitic corrosion resistance with ferritic strength at 1/3 the cost of titanium.

  3. ROI reality: $14/kg immediate savings + 300% longer service life = $2.8M average plant savings over 10 years.

2024’s imperative: Audit your materials against actual brine chemistry data – not legacy assumptions. The plants saving millions are those that abandoned titanium before it abandoned them.

“In desalination, there are two types of engineers: those paying titanium premiums for premature failures, and those using duplex steels to print profit.”

Act now:

  • Download our Desalination Material Selector Tool

  • Request plant-specific duplex ROI calculations

  • Schedule live demo of corrosion monitoring systems

Stop pouring capital into corroding assets. The titanium era is over – and the data has already convicted it.

Submit Your Sourcing Request

RELATED POSTS